“when Elected President, I Will Give Congress 100 Days to Put a Gun Safety Bill on My Desk for Signature. and if They Don’t, I Will Take Executive Action. I’ve Seen Too Many Autopsy Photos and Hugged Too Many Mothers of Homicide Victims to Not Take Action. Enough.” – Kamala Harris [2232×1198]

“when Elected President, I Will Give Congress 100 Days to Put a Gun Safety Bill on My Desk for Signature. and if They Don’t, I Will Take Executive Action. I’ve Seen Too Many Autopsy Photos and Hugged Too Many Mothers of Homicide Victims to Not Take Action. Enough.” – Kamala Harris [2232×1198]
Rate this quote




Author: skacey

Categories:   #Quotes Porn, Everything

Comments

  • Posted: July 14, 2019 23:56

    mgraunk

    Spoken like someone who wants to pander to her base without bringing anything new to the table or offering any concrete solutions.
  • Posted: July 14, 2019 23:56

    OscarTheFountain

    She's a great actress but that's all she is. Just another politician who says whatever is politically expedient at the time.
  • Posted: July 14, 2019 23:56

    OscarTheFountain

    Can we stop posting lame talking points from politicians on this sub?
  • Posted: July 14, 2019 23:56

    stillbatting1000

    The 2nd Amendment was made so we could protect ourselves from government. What happened to "power to the people???" "Cops are evil and racist! But only cops should have guns! Trump is a fascist dictator in charge of government! Which should take away our ability to fight against fascist dictators!" WTF is wrong with these people? Kamala Harris is a lying scumbag. (obviously, she's a politician) Who gives a rat's ass what bullshit spews from her mouth? What a fucking joke.
  • Posted: July 14, 2019 23:56

    EasyCZ_1960

    Spoken like a true authoritarian, statist cuck. She’s a former prosecutor who threw people in jail for drug possession and truancy! Fuck this statist bitch! 😘
  • Posted: July 14, 2019 23:56

    toosinbeymen

    Unfortunately, KH is not a credible candidate. She’s changed her story too many times and way too often seems to be pandering to her current audience.
  • Posted: July 14, 2019 23:56

    Nullus_Tutella

    The true intent and interpretation of the 2nd Amendment? The 2nd Amendment - as written and voted on by the US Congress and ratified by the States: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Now read these 2nd Amendments: A healthy militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and eat food shall not be infringed. So, who has the right to keep and eat food? A well funded militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and use money shall not be infringed. So, who has the right to keep and use money? A communication capable militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and use pen, paper, radios, and computers shall not be infringed. So, who has the right to keep and use computers? So, if the 2nd Amendment meant only militias could have food, money, and computers - would the People have the power to overthrow a tyrannical government? If the 2nd Amendment meant only militias could have firearms - would the 2nd Amendment ensure the American people had the power to defend itself from a tyrannical government? The true intention of the 2nd Amendment is this: To ensure the inalienable right of American citizens to keep and bear the tools necessary to overthrow any government that becomes or threatens to become tyrannical over the American people. The truth about infringement of the 2nd Amendment: Any interpretation of the 2nd Amendment infringing on the ability of the American people to overthrow the US government or defend themselves on an equal footing (Pari passu) basis an infantry soldier of its Army (militia) or of a police force is an infringement of the 2nd Amendment. The true intent of the 2nd Amendment: Is to ensure the people can kill those who govern, and those who are charged with defending those who govern who do not join the people under the tyranny of the governed.
  • Posted: July 14, 2019 23:56

    iamkuato

    How do you plan to handle that pesky Constitution? Do you understand the function of our system of checks and balances? How is anyone supposed to take you seriously when you say things that are objectively stupid?